Citrix Versus Windows Virtual Desktop

Brandon Miyazaki • May 10, 2021
Connect with us

 

We’ve been talking a lot about Windows Virtual Desktop recently and showcasing its many of the benefits. However, it is important to know that there are other hosted desktop and infrastructure options out there! Today, we’ve decided to look at Citrix vs Windows Virtual Desktop (WVD) to help you decide which is the right one for you. 


COST COMPARISON

The cost of Citrix vs Windows Virtual Desktop generally favors Windows Virtual Desktop. Citrix requires multiple servers to be built for management and orchestration, Windows Servers for session hosts, and additional Windows RDS cals. On top of adding in the consultant fees and time to set it up all, you will need Office Pro Plus, hardware and possibly ongoing specialist support services for a Citrix environment. For a 50-user organization, that’s about $120k-$170k upfront. This does not include the recurring costs of licensing or the time required by IT staff to support the environment. 

For the same sized business of 50 users, using Windows Virtual Desktop, the organization will require an Azure subscription (WVD is only available in Azure) and Microsoft 365 licensing. Since Azure offers WVD through its Platform as a Service offerings (PaaS), there is generally much less consultancy and setup time needed. An estimate for this scenario is about $30K to get started (that is quite the cost savings) and the monthly cost per user ranges between $7-$10 dollars a month per user. 

For a cost breakdown, you can use the 
Azure cost calculator.


ADMINISTRATION EXPERIENCE


Citrix administration comes with a much steeper learning curve than WVD. Citrix offers quite a few advanced features and controls that are beneficial, but also take experience to understand, deploy and manage. With Microsoft Windows Virtual desktop, IT administrators can centrally administer the infrastructure from the cloud through the Azure blade. Azure handles orchestration of traditional features like RD Gateway and Collection Broker servers, which makes administering WVD much easier than Citrix. Since WVD is all cloud hosted, there is no need to visit a data center or server room. This means easy, centralized management and ease of use for IT departments. It is important to note that for those organizations that prefer the more robust feature set of Citrix, WVD can have Citrix layered on top in Azure.


USER DESKTOP EXPERIENCE


What the user sees with Citrix vs Windows Virtual Desktop is quite different. With Citrix on premise the user is presented with a Windows Server OS, which will look very different from a user’s desktop operating system. With Windows Virtual Desktop, users see the same Windows 10 desktop. This is great from a usability perspective because WVD provides a familiar workspace for users. Since WVD is a desktop operating system, it can run all the same applications that users normally run. This is not always the case for Citrix environments that use Windows Servers, because there are applications that are not always capable of running or being installed on a server OS. To overcome this, it is possible to present a Windows 10 desktop with Citrix in Azure, but there are extra costs for this type of deployment.


FINAL THOUGHTS


In conclusion, there are a lot of benefits to Windows Virtual Desktop. The cost is a lot lower and implementation a lot easier and simpler. However, since you can use Citrix Cloud on top of Microsoft Windows Virtual Desktop, you do not have to completely rule out Citrix if you want to run a virtual Windows 10 environment. When it comes to Citrix vs Windows Virtual Desktop, WVD does offer some compelling advantages. However, if you already have Citrix and are looking to shift to Windows 10 Virtual Desktops, layering or combining the two solutions is definitely an option.

If you’d like some more information on Windows Virtual Desktop, you can take a deeper dive by visiting the following links:




 

By Shawn Akins October 20, 2025
October 20, 2025 — Early today, Amazon Web Services experienced a major incident centered in its US‑EAST‑1 (N. Virginia) region. AWS reports the event began around 12:11 a.m. PT and tied back to DNS resolution affecting DynamoDB , with mitigation within a couple of hours and recovery continuing thereafter. As the outage rippled, popular services like Snapchat, Venmo, Ring, Roblox, Fortnite , and even some Amazon properties saw disruptions before recovering. If your apps or data are anchored to a single cloud, a morning like this can turn into a help‑desk fire drill. A multi‑cloud or cloud‑smart approach helps you ride through these moments with minimal end‑user impact. What happened (and why it matters) Single‑region fragility: US‑EAST‑1 is massive—and when it sneezes, the internet catches a cold. Incidents here have a history of wide blast radius. Shared dependencies: DNS issues to core services (like DynamoDB endpoints) can cascade across workloads that never directly “touch” that service. Multi‑cloud: practical resilience, not buzzwords For mid‑sized orgs, schools, and local government, multi‑cloud doesn’t have to mean “every app in every cloud.” It means thoughtful redundancy where it counts : Multi‑region or multi‑provider failover for critical apps Run active/standby across AWS and Azure (or another provider), or at least across two AWS regions with automated failover. Start with citizen‑facing portals, SIS/LMS access, emergency comms, and payment gateways. Portable platforms Use Kubernetes and containers, keep state externalized, and standardize infra with Terraform/Ansible so you can redeploy fast when a region (or a provider) wobbles. (Today’s DNS hiccup is exactly the kind of scenario this protects against.) Resilient data layers Replicate data asynchronously across clouds/regions; choose databases with cross‑region failover and test RPO/RTO quarterly. If you rely on a managed database tied to one region, design an escape hatch. Traffic and identity that float Use global traffic managers/DNS to shift users automatically; keep identity (MFA/SSO) highly available and not hard‑wired to a single provider’s control plane. Run the playbook Document health checks, automated cutover, and comms templates. Then practice —tabletops and live failovers. Many services today recovered within hours, but only teams with rehearsed playbooks avoided user‑visible downtime. The bottom line Cloud concentration risk is real. Outages will happen—what matters is whether your constituents, students, and staff feel it. A pragmatic multi‑cloud stance limits the blast radius and keeps your mission‑critical services online when one provider has a bad day. Need a resilience check? Akins IT can help you prioritize which systems should be multi‑cloud, design the right level of redundancy, and validate your failover plan—without overspending. Let’s start with a quick, 30‑minute review of your most critical services and RPO/RTO targets. (No slideware, just actionable next steps.)
By Shawn Akins October 13, 2025
How a Zero-Day in GoAnywhere MFT Sparked a Ransomware Wave—and What Mid-Sized IT Leaders Must Do Now
By Shawn Akins October 13, 2025
The clock is ticking: Learn your options for Windows 11 migration, Extended Security Updates, and cost‑smart strategies before support ends.
More Posts